I should be ashamed that I believe in some principles - most of you here disagree with them so therefore I am rigid and unable to look at other viewpoints - unlike all the people here who have viewpoints that are different than mine.
of course we know the left is open-minded, progressive, tolerant, etc.
except when it comes to views from the right of their own.
so you simply imply that I am bigot
good old fashioned name calling always works best
I should simply be ashamed that I think differently than the democrat party
I, personally, never thought any such thing. The only thing I took exception to was the condescending tone with which you first addressed me.
Originally Posted by Steve Reynolds I should be ashamed that I believe in some principles - most of you here disagree with them so therefore I am rigid and unable to look at other viewpoints - unlike all the people here who have viewpoints that are different than mine.
of course we know the left is open-minded, progressive, tolerant, etc.
except when it comes to views from the right of their own.
so you simply imply that I am bigot
good old fashioned name calling always works best
I should simply be ashamed that I think differently than the democrat party
Holy Crap, Preacher. Have you been secretly talkin' with Goodspeak for advice on how to address this board on political matters?
I should be ashamed that I believe in some principles - most of you here disagree with them so therefore I am rigid and unable to look at other viewpoints - unlike all the people here who have viewpoints that are different than mine.
of course we know the left is open-minded, progressive, tolerant, etc.
except when it comes to views from the right of their own.
so you simply imply that I am bigot
good old fashioned name calling always works best
I should simply be ashamed that I think differently than the democrat party
Yes, this does have a pungent Goodian tang to it, doesn't it?
I should be ashamed that I believe in some principles - most of you here disagree with them so therefore I am rigid and unable to look at other viewpoints - unlike all the people here who have viewpoints that are different than mine.
of course we know the left is open-minded, progressive, tolerant, etc.
except when it comes to views from the right of their own.
so you simply imply that I am bigot
good old fashioned name calling always works best
I should simply be ashamed that I think differently than the democrat party
Think differently...?
Dude, you think only republican platforms and platitudes. There is no "differently" here, just the same old same old.
Let's be honest here, shall we? Most of us think you are rigid because, um....well, you are rigid.
I assume you also believe that James Carville and Mary Matalin share the same political bent, since they are married.
Right?
First, point out to me a single instance in which Andrea Mitchell said something that could be described as "liberal"?
The point is that you can't. Right wingers such as yourself and Reynolds believe that "facts" have an ideology.
Evolution doesn't have an ideology.
Climate change doesn't have an ideology.
Just like it is a scientific "fact" that dioxin, a by-product of the production of PVCs, is one of the most toxic man-made substance. It is not ideological to say that dioxin is a potent toxin.
Yet these are exactly the kinds of "facts" that you and Reynolds claim are ideological.
Similarly, if Andrea Mitchell reports some garden variety "fact" in the name of journalism doesn't make it ideological, simply because you and Reynolds don't choose to believe it. Or it hurts your sensitive feelings.
I am sorry, but that is just plain and simple stupidity.
And that's a fact.
P.S.
By the way, I have a modicum of knowledge about dioxin because I used to cover one of the world's largest dioxin dumps in Jacksonville, Ark., for a statewide newspaper.
But I am sure that you and Reynolds would consider any reporting about toxins to be "ideological," even though, unlike Reynolds, I didn't have a vested interest in the production of dioxin.
First, point out to me a single instance in which Andrea Mitchell said something that could be described as "liberal"?
I never said she was a liberal. You were trying to say that she is not a liberal because she is married to Alan Greenspan. While I do not claim to have a doctorate in logic I am smart enough to know that you may very well be dead wrong. Anyone who is now or has ever been married knows your line of thinking here is way off the mark.
BTW-Your defensive nature in regards to Andrea Mitchell indicates to me that maybe 1) she is a liberal who slants here reporting and you are trying to run cover for her, 2) you have a major woody for the woman or 3) all of the above.
Last edited by Jeffrey Wozniak; January-9th-2010 at 10:23 AM.
Mr Limbaugh was back on the airwaves this week, thank Divine Providence, and he referred to the underwear bomber's brand of briefs as "Fruit of Kaboom." Har!
Compared to how big he was back in the day, yes, he is slim.
I'm just playing along here with the haters who last saw a picture of Limbaugh 15 years ago. The guy who showed them the pic is the same guy who told them what to think about Limbaugh, telling them listening to him and making up their own minds is a waste of time.
Last edited by Jeffrey Wozniak; January-9th-2010 at 11:33 AM.
Actually, since it was you who started this piece of shit thread, it's us who are playing along with you. Seems like you need to troll for predictable responses for some sense of self-affirmation. Pathetic really ...
Last edited by kenny weir; January-9th-2010 at 04:43 PM.
Actually, since it was you who started this piece of shit thread, it's us who are playing along with you. Seems like you need to troll for predictable responses for some sense of self-affirmation. Pathetic really ...
Tormenting liberals is too much fun for anybody to experience without a permit.
One can try to do that or one can try to persuade them, but one can't do both. If you've chosen the former, it's all about your pathology, not your ideology.
What other tormenting or attempted tormenting have you considered great fun? Shall we assume that your fellow right-wingers share your notion of fun?
Last edited by bluenoter; January-10th-2010 at 02:00 AM.
Well, I'm sure you're well aware of this fact Rita, we fat rich conservatives often kick puppies and steal the candy out of the mouths of toddlers just for kicks.
I tried to persuade you earlier in regards to your stance on forcing someone to care about you and your condition. I feel I was fair and honest in our discussion in describing what my wife and I are going through with our son Andrew. I didn't try to make fun of you or call you names (other than the affectionate "toots").
I believe I falied in my attempt to persuade you, but I tried.
Last edited by Jeffrey Wozniak; January-10th-2010 at 09:17 AM.
One can't posess staggering charisma and incessant charm 24/7 Ron. Even those of us who normally woo the masses need a little rest and relaxation now and then.
Last edited by Jeffrey Wozniak; January-10th-2010 at 09:21 AM.
One can't posess staggering charisma and incessant charm 24/7 Ron. Even those of us who normally woo the masses need a little rest and relaxation now and then.
I bet just the back of this man's head sends you into paroxysms, underwear change to ensue. Look! It's a hero.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Pete C
