JazzCorner.com
  Facebook  Twitter

HomeRosterForumsPodcastsNewsJukeboxShopContact

 




Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Registered User Gordon B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    12,778

    Chirac and Mugabe

    Chirac is a revolting human being. Are there any Presidential alternatives to Chirac than socialists and fascists?

    What's going on in Zimbabwe is utterly sickening.


    Article 1
    Article 2

  2. #2
    Registered User Uli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,112

    Re: Chirac and Mugabe

    Originally posted by Gordon B
    Chirac is a revolting human being. Are there any Presidential alternatives to Chirac than socialists and fascists?

    Gordon, you're completely out of line with your transparent little revenge act. One can obviously debate if France should have let Mugabe attend this African summit. Even one of the articles you refer to sez:

    "Despite strong opposition from Britain, Chirac defended the invitation as a way to confront Mugabe face-to-face over the political and economic turmoil engulfing his famine-ridden southern African country.

    However, Chirac's stiff greeting to Mugabe before the opening of the summit was in sharp contrast to the traditional kisses on the cheek reserved for other visiting heads of state from Africa.

    But the British press has pulled no punches in its tirade against Chirac's treatment of Mugabe, who is accused of violently repressing opponents and leading his country to starvation. "

    Instead of the British press it should probably say the Murdoch press. And that's about the niveau of your post. '

  3. #3
    Registered User crawjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,233

    Re: Re: Chirac and Mugabe

    Originally posted by Uli
    Gordon, you're completely out of line with your transparent little revenge act. One can obviously debate if France should have let Mugabe attend this African summit. Even one of the articles you refer to sez:

    "Despite strong opposition from Britain, Chirac defended the invitation as a way to confront Mugabe face-to-face over the political and economic turmoil engulfing his famine-ridden southern African country.

    However, Chirac's stiff greeting to Mugabe before the opening of the summit was in sharp contrast to the traditional kisses on the cheek reserved for other visiting heads of state from Africa.

    But the British press has pulled no punches in its tirade against Chirac's treatment of Mugabe, who is accused of violently repressing opponents and leading his country to starvation. "

    Instead of the British press it should probably say the Murdoch press. And that's about the niveau of your post. '
    I find it interesting that every time somebody links to an article declaiming Bush as a liar or fascist, people immediately chime in with "right on!" When it's somebody else though, it's "out of line."

    Give me a break. What would you be saying if this was Bush, Uli?

  4. #4
    Registered User Uli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,112

    Re: Re: Re: Chirac and Mugabe

    Originally posted by crawjo

    Give me a break.
    Why should I give you war-heads a break? I really don't understand what's humanly despicable in trying to diplomatically solve issues even with very questionable heads of countries. The stuff quoted from the Sun-times is not really the stuff for good political discourse, imho.

    I might be wrong, but I really have not read anything that would lead me in any way to believe that Chirac supports any of Mugabe's policies.
    Last edited by Uli; February-28th-2004 at 07:03 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User crawjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,233
    And the stuff Chris links to is good for political discourse?

  6. #6
    Registered User crawjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    12,233
    And am I to take it then, Uli, that you applaud Don Rumsfeld for shaking hands with Hussein in the 1980s?

  7. #7
    Registered User Uli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,112
    Originally posted by crawjo
    And am I to take it then, Uli, that you applaud Don Rumsfeld for shaking hands with Hussein in the 1980s?
    No, that was a complete different thing and at that point the US really did support Hussein.

    btw, yehh I find the articles that Chris posts way above the niveau of the Sun-Times.

  8. #8
    .
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    2,831

    Re: Re: Re: Chirac and Mugabe

    Crawjo: "Give me a break. What would you be saying if this was Bush, Uli?"

    If Mugabe had been Bush senior, Chirac might have confronted him in French
    If Mugabe had been Bush junior, Bush might have confronted Chirac with his illegitimate child.
    Last edited by Sand; February-29th-2004 at 04:01 AM.

  9. #9
    Registered User Tom Storer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Paris, France
    Posts
    6,936
    I haven't read the linked articles yet, but would tend to agree that Chirac is revolting. Perhaps no more revolting than your average head of a large and powerful nation, but certainly no less. Apparently the only real electoral alternatives to Chirac (if indeed he runs again) will be a fascist or a socialist. Guess who I'll be rooting for.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This jazz site is part of