Go Back   Jazzcorner's Speakeasy > THE ALLEY
Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July-23rd-2005, 10:27 AM   #1
Gary Sisco
The Bluegrass
 
Gary Sisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: no country for old men
Posts: 30,835
Payola Scam And The Righteous Major Labels

The real problem is those damned unprincipled, criminal kids downloading songs, I tell ya.

Sony BMG to Settle New York Payola Investigation
Music giant makes a deal with New York Atty. Gen. Eliot Spitzer over case involving payments for airtime
By Charles Duhigg and Walter Hamilton
Times Staff Writer

4:58 PM PDT, July 22, 2005

Sony BMG Music Entertainment, the nation's second-largest music company, is expected as early as Monday to agree to a settlement with New York Atty. Gen. Eliot Spitzer in an ongoing payola investigation, said sources familiar with the talks.

Representatives of Sony BMG and Spitzer declined to detail ongoing discussions, but sources said the terms of the settlement might include promises that Sony BMG would not engage in certain practices and fines that might exceed $10 million. The sources requested anonymity because of the confidentiality of the discussions.

Sony BMG is one of at least four record companies Spitzer subpoenaed last fall as part of his inquiry into whether music corporations are skirting payola laws by hiring intermediaries to influence which songs are heard on public airwaves. Should Sony BMG reach an accord with Spitzer, it would be the first settlement in the investigation.

Insiders at other record companies said they expected that a Sony BMG settlement would spur other music corporations to agree to similar deals with Spitzer's office. Those executives said whatever fine Sony BMG might accept probably would also set the standard for other companies, which would be fined in proportion to each company's share of the U.S. market.

Last September, investigators in Spitzer's office subpoenaed executives at the four major record corporations -- Universal Music Group, Sony BMG, Warner Music Group and EMI Group -- to request copies of billing records, contracts, e-mails and other correspondence regarding the companies' relationships with independent music promoters who suggest new songs to radio programmers.

Those intermediaries have long been suspected of passing payments to deejays in exchange for airplay of specific songs. Such payments would violate a federal statute known as the payola law, which prohibits broadcasters from taking cash or anything of value in exchange for playing specific songs, unless they disclose the transaction to listeners.

In May, Sony BMG divulged that at least a dozen executives, including Sony Music U.S. President and Chief Executive Donnie Ienner, had received subpoenas.

Since Spitzer's investigation began, the three other record companies have circulated internal memos outlining unacceptable promotion practices company insiders said.

Radio airplay is considered the most powerful promotional tool for record companies. In the past, labels blatantly traded cash, drugs and prostitutes for airplay.

Today, record companies pay independent promoters to persuade radio programmers to spin particular songs.

The independent promoters pay radio stations annual fees, sometimes in excess of $100,000, in exchange for advance copies of the stations' playlists. Promoters say these fees do not influence a radio station's choice of songs. However, critics suggest that the payments are a way to skirt the law.

Last November, Infinity Broadcasting Corp., the nation's second-largest radio broadcaster, fired a programmer suspected of accepting gift certificates from an independent promoter. In January, Entercom Communications Corp., another radio broadcaster, fired a top programming executive amid an internal investigation into whether he accepted travel packages and other gifts directly from record label executives.

Since then, Infinity announced that it would sever the company's ties with independent promoters. Radio heavyweight Clear Channel Communications Inc. announced in 2003 that it would not renew contracts with independent promoters

*******************************

I'd assumed as much, given the quality of the music. You'd pretty much have to pay for airplay for most of it.
Gary Sisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-23rd-2005, 11:57 AM   #2
frankiepop
koong
 
frankiepop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,008
you would think b4 they bitch about missing royalties that they would at least run a clean ship....
__________________
fpop
frankiepop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-23rd-2005, 12:29 PM   #3
Jazzooo
Registered User
 
Jazzooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Miguel de Allende
Posts: 3,698
Settlements should not be allowed in criminal investigations.
Jazzooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-23rd-2005, 01:14 PM   #4
jesus marion joseph
holier than thou
 
jesus marion joseph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 8,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzooo
Settlements should not be allowed in criminal investigations.
jesus marion joseph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-23rd-2005, 02:00 PM   #5
Gary Sisco
The Bluegrass
 
Gary Sisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: no country for old men
Posts: 30,835
Why not? They buy everything else, like airtime for their suck records. Why not buy a way out of court, too? Isn't that the American Way?
Gary Sisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-25th-2005, 12:17 AM   #6
patricia
We are the only reality
 
patricia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: beautiful British Columbia
Posts: 14,522
Barely related, but this reminds me of the claims by record companies that songs downloaded eats into their profits. They base this, as far as I can tell by assigning an estimate of what they would have been paid for CDs that the downloaders would have bought, had they not downloaded the songs free.
It's always mystified me that they assume that the downloaded material would have been bought, just because it was being listened to free. I've never believed that the estimate was a true one. How can they assume that all or even any of that music would necessarily been bought just because people were listening to it?? So the estimated lost revenue is an inflated one, at best, IMO.
patricia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July-25th-2005, 11:42 AM   #7
clinthopson
The mouldiest of all figs
 
clinthopson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 11,249
I am curious how the artists and composers are paid when a recoerding is downloaded on iTunes or the others.

Do they get their usual royalties?
__________________
Stand clear of the doors
clinthopson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Jazzcorner's Speakeasy > THE ALLEY

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All material copyright 2009 jazzcorner.com