More rightwing theivery

[rollhead]

Dollars, Not Sense: Government Contracting Under the Bush Administration

Monday, June 19, 2006 --
Under the Bush Administration, the “shadow government” of private companies working under federal contract has exploded in size. Between 2000 and 2005, procurement spending increased by over $175 billion dollars, making federal contracts the fastest growing component of federal discretionary spending.

This growth in federal procurement has enriched private contractors. But it has also come at a steep cost for federal taxpayers. Overcharging has been frequent, and billions of dollars of taxpayer money have been squandered.

At the request of Rep. Henry A. Waxman, this report is the first comprehensive assessment of federal contracting under the Bush Administration. The report reaches three primary conclusions:

Procurement Spending Is Accelerating Rapidly. Between 2000 and 2005, procurement spending rose by 86% to $377.5 billion annually. Spending on federal contracts grew over twice as fast as other discretionary federal spending. Under President Bush, the federal government is now spending nearly 40 cents of every discretionary dollar on contracts with private companies, a record level.

Contract Mismanagement Is Widespread. The growth in federal contracts has been accompanied by pervasive mismanagement. Mistakes have been made in virtually every step of the contracting process: from pre-contract planning through contract award and oversight to recovery of contract overcharges.
The Costs to the Taxpayer Are Enormous. The report identifies 118 federal contracts worth $745.5 billion that have been found by government officials to include significant waste, fraud, abuse, or mismanagement. Each of the Bush Administration’s three signature initiatives — homeland security, the war and reconstruction in Iraq, and Hurricane Katrina recovery — has been characterized by wasteful contract spending.

There is no single reason for the rising waste, fraud, and abuse in federal contracting. Multiple causes — including poor planning, noncompetitive awards, abuse of contract flexibilities, inadequate oversight, and corruption — have all played a part. The problems are widespread, undermining such major initiatives as domestic spending on homeland security, the rebuilding of Iraq, and the recovery from Hurricane Katrina.

Government contracting grew by 86%.
Noncompetitive contracts grew by 115%.

Federal procurement spending is highly concentrated on a few large contractors, with the five largest federal contractors receiving over 20% of the contract dollars awarded in 2005. Last year, the largest federal contractor, Lockheed Martin, received contracts worth more than the total combined budgets of the Department of Commerce, the Department of the Interior, the Small Business Administration, and the U.S. Congress. The fastest growing contractor under the Bush Administration has been Halliburton. Federal spending on Halliburton contracts increased over 600% between 2000 and 2005.

[GoodSpeak]

I appreciate your sentiment, Rollie, but to be fair, the government does a great job wasting taxpayer monies on $200 dollar toilet seats, my ultra-liberal friend.





The clue is here....grab it.

[walto]

Lawmakers' Profits Are Scrutinized - Hastert and Others Defend Land

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 22, 2006; A01

House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) made a $2 million profit last
year on the sale of land 5 1/2 miles from a highway project that he
helped to finance with targeted federal funds.

A Republican House member from California, meanwhile, received nearly
double what he paid for a four-acre parcel near an Air Force base
after securing $8 million for a planned freeway interchange 16 miles
away. And another California GOP congressman obtained funding in last
year's highway bill for street improvements near a planned residential
and commercial development that he co-owns.

In all three cases, Hastert and Reps. Ken Calvert and Gary Miller say
that they were securing funds their home districts wanted badly, and
that in no way did the earmarks have any impact on the land values of
their investments. But for watchdog groups, the cases have opened a
fresh avenue for investigation and a new wrinkle in the ongoing
controversy over earmarks -- home-district projects funded through
narrowly written legislative language.

For more than a year, the congressional corruption scandal triggered
by former lobbyist Jack Abramoff has focused attention on earmarks
secured by lawmakers on lobbyists' and government contractors' behalf.
Now watchdog groups are combing through lawmakers' land holdings and
legislative activities, searching for earmarks that may have boosted
the value of those investments.

"The sound bites from politicians have always been that they're doing
what's best for their districts, but we're starting to see a pattern
that looks like they might be doing what's best for their
pocketbooks," said Keith Ashdown, vice president of the group
Taxpayers for Common Sense.

The allegation that Hastert used a home-district "earmark" for his
personal enrichment is now at the center of a tussle between the most
powerful man in Congress and a new watchdog organization that
uncovered the land deal this month. Hastert has strongly denied any
wrongdoing and has demanded a retraction from the Sunlight Foundation,
a new group that first made the allegation in a detailed report on its
Web site last week.

At issue is a series of events that left Hastert $2 million richer and
his district well on its way to securing a highway that has been the
subject of a dispute between pro-growth and slow-growth forces for
years. The controversy has been extensively reported by the Illinois
news media.

In 2002, Hastert was driving to a parade in Sycamore, Ill., when he
saw a post-and-beam house he fell in love with, according to Dallas C.
Ingemunson, a longtime friend and ally of Hastert's who made the land
deals for the speaker. Hastert struck a deal with the owner on the
spot, purchasing the house near Plano, Ill., and 195 acres for $2.1
million.

In February 2004, Ingemunson, treasurer of Hastert's campaign
committee and chairman of the Kendall County Republican Party,
established Little Rock Trust #225. A week later, through the trust,
Hastert and his business partners purchased a 69-acre parcel for
$340,000, providing road access to part of Hastert's farm that had
been landlocked. Hastert owned a quarter of that parcel.

In May 2005, Hastert transferred the 69 acres of previously hemmed-in
land from his farm to the land trust. That summer, Hastert personally
intervened during House and Senate negotiations over a huge
transportation and infrastructure bill to secure two separate
earmarks, $152 million to help build the Prairie Parkway through
Kendall County and $55 million for an interchange 5 1/2 miles from his
property. President Bush signed the bill into law on Aug. 10.

Then, on Dec. 7, Little Rock Trust #225 sold the Hastert parcels to a
subsidiary of the Robert Arthur Land Co. for nearly $5 million. The
deal netted Hastert a $2 million profit.

Arthur C. Zwemke, a Robert Arthur partner whose company plans to build
a 1,635-home residential and commercial development on the site,
scoffed at assertions that the Prairie Parkway had boosted the value
of Hastert's land. The price for the land had been locked up in 2004
by land speculator Ron March, who then ceded the project to Robert
Arthur Land, he said. The price, he added, could not have risen with
the news of the Prairie Parkway funding. Besides, the parkway is still
years from construction, he noted, and land prices are soaring as
Chicago's sprawl moves ever westward.

Hastert's attorney, J. Randolph Evans, fired off a letter to the
Sunlight Foundation last week, demanding "that the false, libelous and
defamatory matter be immediately withdrawn and corrected." In his
letter, Evans said that asserting that a new road project would have
an impact on land values more than 5 1/2 miles away "would be like
complaining about a purchase in Alexandria, Virginia, based on
renovations at the Capitol."

Bill Allison, who uncovered the matter for the Sunlight Foundation,
has stood by his findings. And Jan Strasma, chairman of Citizens
Against the Sprawlway, which has been fighting the Prairie Parkway,
disputes Evans's argument. Home buyers are not looking to live next to
a highway, he said. They just want easy access to a nearby
transportation corridor.

Ashdown, of Taxpapers for Common Sense, who has chronicled Hastert's
efforts to secure the parkway funding, also remains suspicious.

"The facts are the facts," he said, "and the facts are, he made a lot
of money off this deal, and he was the one who got this earmark."

The foundation's allegation is only the latest in a series of charges.
Last year, Calvert, the California Republican congressman, and a
business partner bought a four-acre parcel near the March Air Reserve
Base in Riverside County, Calif., for $550,000. He then secured $8
million for a planned freeway interchange 16 miles away, an additional
$1.5 million to support commercial development around the airfield,
and sold the property less than a year later for almost $1 million.

Calvert spokesman Bob Carretta pointed to the findings of a Los
Angeles-based watchdog group that concluded that Calvert's profit was
in line with the rise in market values in the area.

Miller, the other California Republican, helped secure $1.28 million
in last year's highway bill for street improvements near a planned
residential and commercial development in Diamond Bar, Calif., that he
co-owns with a top campaign contributor.

Kevin McKee, a Miller spokesman, said the road improvement was a mile
away from the development and had been designated by Diamond Bar
officials as their top priority

[rollhead]

walto. you beat me to the punch.