Old August-2nd-2003, 08:32 AM   #1
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Monk w/Rouse recording

Does anyone know the title of a recording that Monk did w/Rouse in San Francisco? [I don't know whether it's a "live" recording or not.]
I heard a cut on radio the other day, Rouse knocked me out(more than usual), and, Monk's playing was quite different from anything that I had heard previously.
The announcer sorta mumbled the title. I don't know if "San Francisco" was actually part of the title or if that is just where it was recorded.

thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old August-2nd-2003, 09:33 AM   #2
hearsay
QAMS2005
 
hearsay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,133
Is it live at the Black Hawk? There's a trumpet player on that one too.
hearsay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-2nd-2003, 09:41 AM   #3
Uli
poor folk's child
 
Uli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,178
It may also be Monk at the IT club. I am not quite sure but I think this was a SF club.


Have heard that just recently for the first time and my reaction was quite similar to yours both iro Monk and Rouse.

Last edited by Uli; August-2nd-2003 at 10:52 AM.
Uli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-2nd-2003, 12:17 PM   #4
frankpop1
Registered User
 
frankpop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 468
live at the jazz workshop - possible


san francisco holiday - here's where u can catch some of the noise. that may help
http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/....asp?aid=63853
__________________
mmkay
frankpop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-3rd-2003, 10:53 AM   #5
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No luck so far, for various reasons. It could have been a compilation, but, I'd like to avoid the compilation route.
Still searching; that was a damn good cut.
  Reply With Quote
Old August-3rd-2003, 04:26 PM   #6
frankpop1
Registered User
 
frankpop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 468
well my curiosity is peaked. contact the mumbly dj for an answer.
__________________
mmkay
frankpop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-4th-2003, 11:46 AM   #7
Pete C
Reevaluating @ 500k
 
Pete C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 31,322
Quote:
Originally posted by frankpop1
well my curiosity is peaked.
You mean it's all downhill from here?
Pete C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-4th-2003, 05:07 PM   #8
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by frankpop1
well my curiosity is peaked. contact the mumbly dj for an answer.
Yeah.
[I wanted to avoid a long distance phone call, hence the computer. And, the "trails probably dead." They played the tune last week and I've forgotten the exact time.]
  Reply With Quote
Old August-5th-2003, 01:00 AM   #9
frankpop1
Registered User
 
frankpop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 468
well, it's worth a try. plus, a lot of stations have email. mostly, they ignore a lot of email, but i find that after a couple tries without a response, a barrage of emails gains their attention or a restraining order. but hell, i paper the bathrooms with them.
__________________
mmkay
frankpop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-14th-2003, 12:50 PM   #10
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, I "took a chance" and got MONK Live At The Jazz Workshop
Complete. Although, it's not the cd in topic, I haven't any regrets; except it's just not the particular recording that I had in mind.
  Reply With Quote
Old August-14th-2003, 02:21 PM   #11
Scott Dolan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree, the complete Jazz Workshop recording is worth it's weight in gold. If you really like that one, I highly suggest The Complete Live At The It Club, as well as Monk In Tokyo. All double cd's, all incredible music.

I for one have no clue why so many people were down on Monk's Columbia days. I thought Rouse was the most incredible fit that Monk ever had in ANY of his groups.
  Reply With Quote
Old August-14th-2003, 02:38 PM   #12
Hans Blix
Registered User
 
Hans Blix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Uppsala/NY
Posts: 37
"Bright Mississippi"

disc 2, "Live at the Jazz Workshop"

truth



HB
Hans Blix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-14th-2003, 08:39 PM   #13
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
......I for one have no clue why so many people were down on Monk's Columbia days. I thought Rouse was the most incredible fit that Monk ever had in ANY of his groups.
Are you serious(?)! Wait. Seems like I heard something to that effect also. I, for one, thoroughly enjoy Rouse w/Monk.

Quote:
"Bright Mississippi"...
That is a burner!
dot...dot..dot........dot.dot.dotdot..dot
  Reply With Quote
Old August-15th-2003, 12:19 PM   #14
john williams
Registered User
 
john williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,331
Quote:
Originally posted by jazzbluescat
Are you serious(?)! Wait. Seems like I heard something to that effect also. I, for one, thoroughly enjoy Rouse w/Monk.
I agree and will second Scott's vote for the IT Club recording. SF or LA? It doesn't matter its a great set.

However, according to the cover notes on IT Club-
I'm Getting Sentimental Over You/All the Things You Are/Epistrophy from the reissued/complete IT Club were originally miscredited as being performed in SF on the album "Misterioso"CL 2416/CS 9416.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by john williams; August-15th-2003 at 12:27 PM.
john williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-15th-2003, 04:49 PM   #15
frankpop1
Registered User
 
frankpop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 468
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
......I for one have no clue why so many people were down on Monk's Columbia days. I thought Rouse was the most incredible fit that Monk ever had in ANY of his groups.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

im not arguing this neither, but i cant say that i ever heard any of this nature b4. are u saying some critics didnt like rouse?
__________________
mmkay
frankpop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-20th-2003, 09:40 PM   #16
shrugs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,939
I seems to remember some folks here crying out for the Griffin and slamming Rouse. I dig Rouse a lot. Especailly with the tribute band with Lacy et al.
shrugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-20th-2003, 10:26 PM   #17
bluenoter
Registered Osprey
 
bluenoter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: DC (Taxation Without Representation)
Posts: 8,888
Quote:
Originally posted by shrugs
I seems to remember some folks here crying out for the Griffin and slamming Rouse.
There's some Griffin vs. Rouse discussion (and Riverside vs. Columbia discussion) in this thread in the Archives. I remembered it because I had asked about Rouse/Columbia.
bluenoter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-20th-2003, 11:05 PM   #18
Sergio Zamora
Registered Loser
 
Sergio Zamora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Altered State Of Drugafornia
Posts: 7,663
I dig Rouse alright (IT CLUB!!), but Misterioso and Thelonious In Action are two of my favorite Monks, and one of the reasons is Griffin.
Sergio Zamora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-20th-2003, 11:07 PM   #19
shrugs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,939
I think it got a little deep er on some other threads with people stating they would prefer to not even listen to Rouse.
Myself, I can listen to griff or rouse or trane with Monk. It's all good.
shrugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-21st-2003, 01:40 AM   #20
MRS
Registered User
 
MRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,026
I've wanted to start a "Fuck Those Who Deride Rouse" thread since Jazz Central Station.
MRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-21st-2003, 09:25 AM   #21
Tanager
Hartsell Cash, 1924-2006
 
Tanager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 6,222
Count me among the Monk w/Rouse fans. I don't understand the anti-Rouse vitriol at all.
__________________
--
Tanager
Tanager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-21st-2003, 12:25 PM   #22
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
.......Myself, I can listen to griff or rouse or trane with Monk. It's all good.
That's a truism.
Damn right.
You can say that again.
  Reply With Quote
Old August-21st-2003, 07:25 PM   #23
frankpop1
Registered User
 
frankpop1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: harrisburg, pa
Posts: 468
.......Myself, I can listen to griff or rouse or trane with Monk. It's all good.
__________________
mmkay
frankpop1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-21st-2003, 09:11 PM   #24
jazzbluescat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote
Old August-29th-2003, 06:44 PM   #25
Scott Dolan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, as far as critics go, I'm not sure if they were down on Monk's Columbia days because of Rouse neccessarily. Most of them just seemed disappointed in Monk's playing. Saying he had lost his edge, and other such nonsense. But yes, some of them often said things to the effect that Rouse couldn't play, and so on.

Many critics also tried to weakly back up their point about Monk by citing the fact that he didn't write that many new tunes while recording for Columbia.

None of the things I've stated here are worth a shit in my book. Monk was a fucking genius until the day he died, and Rouse is one of the greatest and most underrated tenor players in all of Jazz.

Period.
  Reply With Quote
Old August-29th-2003, 10:02 PM   #26
Nate Dorward
the cantilena of speech
 
Nate Dorward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,520
To chime in on the last post: yes I think that the objections to Monk's Columbia period went beyond Rouse (though there were certainly objectors to him: I seem to recall Whitney Balliett for instance trashing Rouse's playing in one of his earliest appearances with Monk, the Town Hall Concert). The repertoire got stale, Monk stopped writing tunes for the most part & seemed little interested in delving into his back catalogue beyond the same handful of numbers (though I think it's on the It Club sessions that he at last gives "Brake's Sake" another spin?). I suppose the problem is not Rouse per se but his incredibly lengthy tenure in the band--the intriguing experimentations & frequent shifts of personnel of the period up to the close of the Riverside tenure were set aside mostly, beyond a few one-off big band discs.

That's the case against FWIW, leaving aside questions of Monk's own supposed decline in powers. I don't know Monk's Columbia work well: in fact I only have the Big Band/Quartet augmented CD reissue, though I used to have Monk's Dream, the Pee Wee Russell session & the solo disc on tape. I like the Big Band set a lot, better than the Town Hall set actually, though as with a lot of Monk of this period it has an unchanging pecking order of soloists that leaves the extraordinary band less than fully used (Steve Lacy is present but never gets a solo, for instance). & actually I liked all the other discs I've heard to varying degrees--Monk's Dream especially--& keep meaning to pick up more of this stuff. I kinda like the extra pep Frankie Dunlop gives the work of this period--the usual spacious Monk mid-tempo walk kicked up a notch or two. -- The canard about Monk not writing much is a bit misleading; he'd already slowed down writing much by the end of his Riverside tenure; usually each disc has only one new composition, with reworkings of old material for the rest of the disc.
Nate Dorward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August-30th-2003, 07:54 PM   #27
Scott Dolan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Great post, Nate. Actually, Monk's Dream, and Criss Cross are my studio faves from the Columbia era. Good call.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Jazzcorner's Speakeasy > RECORD REVIEWS

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All material copyright 2009 jazzcorner.com