December-2nd-2008, 09:03 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 2,325
|
Canadian political turmoil
__________________
Soulless Blackberry-using weasel with coffee breath
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 09:22 AM
|
#2
|
|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯__
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,447
|
Yeah, it's kinda wild. Appears to me a simultaneously bold and pathetic power grab by the opposition. Looks like a pretty bad deal overall, with Bloc Quebecois getting a few years of tasty morsels for Quebec just to agree not to topple an otherwise unstable charade, and two leaders rejected in polls 8 weeks ago splitting spoils.
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 09:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 2,325
|
Quebec always gets tasty morsels so I'm not sure how that's any different. I think the opposition parties have basically been bullied into this and I'm glad to see Harper's arrogance finally get the better of him. One thing the Conservatives seem to forget is that nobody voted for Stephen as Prime Minister and they aren't in Washington. This is the risk you take when you govern like you have a majority when you don't.
__________________
Soulless Blackberry-using weasel with coffee breath
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 09:53 AM
|
#4
|
|
poor folk's child
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by claude
Fun times in politics!!
They said they were taking this extraordinary action because the Harper government failed to deliver an economic-stimulus package in its fall fiscal update.
|
Is there an economists' consensus in this matter?
Last edited by Uli; December-2nd-2008 at 09:58 AM.
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 10:40 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New Brunswick
Posts: 2,325
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uli
Is there an economists' consensus in this matter?
|
I don't know, but I doubt it. Personally, I don't think a stimulus is needed right now. We don't have any serious banking issues other than the fact that the bankers have become very risk averse but that won't change with more capital since they already have plenty. There is the auto industry issue, but for us to proceed with funding that industry on our own before the US does would be stupid.
This stuff is purely political from both sides, I doubt if either side really gives a rats ass about how this stuff will affect the average Canadian. I guess we are getting the government we deserve
__________________
Soulless Blackberry-using weasel with coffee breath
Last edited by claude; December-2nd-2008 at 10:43 AM.
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 11:55 AM
|
#6
|
|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯__
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,447
|
Canada's in the best shape of all the G8, afaik - the economic rationale given for the opposition's move seems transparently political. They're not even giving the Tories a chance to present a revised budget that could address stated concerns. Yes, Harper is paying for Conservative hubris with their rabble-rousing provisions of anti-strike and removing public funding for parties, but it's hardly Big Stuff that justifies the action.
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 12:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Quitting @ 10.4k
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York state
Posts: 11,087
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uli
Is there an economists' consensus in this matter?
|
Of course there is: cut taxes, deregulate, privatize and outsource jobs.
__________________
WOW!
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 11:06 PM
|
#8
|
|
Isn't life WONDERFUL !
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 3,813
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince Kargatis
Yeah, it's kinda wild. Appears to me a simultaneously bold and pathetic power grab by the opposition. Looks like a pretty bad deal overall, with Bloc Quebecois getting a few years of tasty morsels for Quebec just to agree not to topple an otherwise unstable charade, and two leaders rejected in polls 8 weeks ago splitting spoils.
|
Bloc shuts its mouth for ANYTHING that could happen and you think its a good deal ???
__________________
All or nothing at all
|
|
|
December-2nd-2008, 11:45 PM
|
#9
|
|
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯__
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,447
|
I don't follow. I described what I thought was a "bad deal", not what I might think a good one might look like. And I meant a bad deal for the public - this is not what looks like "good government" to me.
|
|
|
Lower Navigation
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.
|
|