|
Parker/Schlippenbach/Lytton Anywhere But Tonic
Houston reporting. I drove 250 miles there, stayed the night with a friend who also came to the concert, and drove 250 miles back the next day. It would have been well worth driving 500 miles for and staying with someone I detested who slashed my tires just before I was due to leave.
Capacity crowd at a dance studio in downtown Houston -- I estimate 90-100, but that could be way off. After the break, Schlippenbach came back playing a medley of 2 Monk tunes, one of which was Work and I can't recall the other. He improvised on the tunes in a standard manner -- and very well, it is probably not necessary to add. I think on the old Tonic thread someone mentioned a similar thing happened elsewhere, but the poster characterized it as "a joke." I don't think it was a joke. It was shocking and surprising, and would not have worked except as the opening to the second set. But it worked really well as an integrated part of the performance. If Parker had come out playing Giant Steps that could only have been a joke, no matter how well he played it. I cannot explain the difference -- anyone care to try (assuming you agree)?
It was also very interesting to watch Parker when he wasn't playing. He listened intently to Schlippenbach, of course (and Lytton, too, I imagine), but I was intrigued by the fact that he was constantly fingering his saxophone. I expect that at each moment he was fingering what he would play if he were to reenter right then so that he would be right on top of it when he decided that the moment was right to actually reenter. Perhaps this sort of thing is common in free improv -- I have heard a lot of free improv, but seen relatively little. Again, anyone care to comment? I certainly have never seen anything comparable at a regular (or not so regular) jazz gig. (Apologies to those who insist that Parker plays jazz -- I disagree (except for the Charlie Watts Big Band etc.), but that is not in any way a criticism!)
As for the rest of the concert -- well, you probably know what Parker et. al. sound like if you are reading this post, so I'll just leave it at "sublime."
|