Old October-24th-2004, 08:35 AM   #1
Gary Sisco
The Bluegrass
 
Gary Sisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: no country for old men
Posts: 30,835
Tell It Like ... It Is

finally. From The Guardian, UK:

Dumb show

Charlie Brooker
Saturday October 23, 2004
The Guardian

Heady times. The US election draws ever nearer, and while the rest of the world bangs its head against the floorboards screaming "Please God, not Bush!", the candidates clash head to head in a series of live televised debates. It's a bit like American Idol, but with terrifying global ramifications. You've got to laugh.
Or have you? Have you seen the debates? I urge you to do so. The exemplary BBC News website (www.bbc.co.uk/news) hosts unexpurgated streaming footage of all the recent debates, plus clips from previous encounters, through Reagan and Carter, all the way back to Nixon versus JFK.

Watching Bush v Kerry, two things immediately strike you. First, the opening explanation of the rules makes the whole thing feel like a Radio 4 parlour game. And second, George W Bush is... well, he's... Jesus, where do you start?

The internet's a-buzz with speculation that Bush has been wearing a wire, receiving help from some off-stage lackey. Screen grabs appearing to show a mysterious bulge in the centre of his back are being traded like Top Trumps. Prior to seeing the debate footage, I regarded this with healthy scepticism: the whole "wire" scandal was just wishful thinking on behalf of some amateur Michael Moores, I figured. And then I watched the footage.

Quite frankly, the man's either wired or mad. If it's the former, he should be flung out of office: tarred, feathered and kicked in the nuts. And if it's the latter, his behaviour goes beyond strange, and heads toward terrifying. He looks like he's listening to something we can't hear. He blinks, he mumbles, he lets a sentence trail off, starts a new one, then reverts back to whatever he was saying in the first place. Each time he recalls a statistic (either from memory or the voice in his head), he flashes us a dumb little smile, like a toddler proudly showing off its first bowel movement. Forgive me for employing the language of the playground, but the man's a tool.

Advertiser links
Compare Multiple Auto Insurance Quotes
NetQuote's fast free online rates. Comparison shop...

netquote.com

Progressive Insurance - Official Site
Save hundreds on car insurance - compare rates online at...

progressive.com

Auto Insurance
Are you a driver over 50? You could save up to $300 in...

aarp.thehartford.com
So I sit there and I watch this and I start scratching my head, because I'm trying to work out why Bush is afforded any kind of credence or respect whatsoever in his native country. His performance is so transparently bizarre, so feeble and stumbling, it's a miracle he wasn't laughed off the stage. And then I start hunting around the internet, looking to see what the US media made of the whole "wire" debate. And they just let it die. They mentioned it in passing, called it a wacko conspiracy theory and moved on.

Yet whether it turns out to be true or not, right now it's certainly plausible - even if you discount the bulge photos and simply watch the president's ridiculous smirking face. Perhaps he isn't wired. Perhaps he's just gone gaga. If you don't ask the questions, you'll never know the truth.

The silence is all the more troubling since in the past the US news media has had no problem at all covering other wacko conspiracy theories, ones with far less evidence to support them. (For infuriating confirmation of this, watch the second part of the must-see documentary series The Power Of Nightmares (Wed, 9pm, BBC2) and witness the absurd hounding of Bill Clinton over the Whitewater and Vince Foster non-scandals.)

Throughout the debate, John Kerry, for his part, looks and sounds a bit like a haunted tree. But at least he's not a lying, sniggering, drink-driving, selfish, reckless, ignorant, dangerous, backward, drooling, twitching, blinking, mouse-faced little cheat. And besides, in a fight between a tree and a bush, I know who I'd favour.

On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses. And Sod's law dictates he'll probably win, thereby disproving the existence of God once and for all. The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr - where are you now that we need you?
Gary Sisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October-24th-2004, 08:39 AM   #2
frankiepop
koong
 
frankiepop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,008
perhaps they should focus upon their own prime minister first.
frankiepop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October-24th-2004, 10:01 AM   #3
Gary Sisco
The Bluegrass
 
Gary Sisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: no country for old men
Posts: 30,835
Why? Do you think Blair would have invaded Iraq on his own? He's been following the American president around with his nose up close to the presidential ass, like a dog, ever since he became PM. Change presidents and you'll change Blair's policies as well. I can't believe the Brits want such a toady for PM.

Last edited by Gary Sisco; October-24th-2004 at 10:03 AM.
Gary Sisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October-24th-2004, 06:56 PM   #4
Nathaniel Catchpole
Registered User
 
Nathaniel Catchpole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lower Clapton
Posts: 1,261
No, we don't, but this alternative Thatcher hangover is arguably worse:



The Guardian, on the other hand, are wimpy gits. Worth pointing out that the original article appeared in their pull-out arts/tv listings section:

Screen Burn, The Guide

Sunday October 24, 2004
The Guardian

The final sentence of a column in The Guide on Saturday caused offence to some readers. The Guardian associates itself with the following statement from the writer.

"Charlie Brooker apologises for any offence caused by his comments relating to President Bush in his TV column, Screen Burn. The views expressed in this column are not those of the Guardian. Although flippant and tasteless, his closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action - an intention he believed regular readers of his humorous column would understand. He deplores violence of any kind."
Nathaniel Catchpole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October-24th-2004, 09:09 PM   #5
GoodSpeak
Next year....
 
GoodSpeak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The San Joaquin Valley, CA
Posts: 23,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankiepop
perhaps they should focus upon their own prime minister first.
Geez, F-pop.



Do you even know what planet you're on?



Amazing.





Idiots on parade, boys and girls.

Last edited by GoodSpeak; October-24th-2004 at 09:11 PM.
GoodSpeak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October-25th-2004, 09:20 AM   #6
Gary Sisco
The Bluegrass
 
Gary Sisco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: no country for old men
Posts: 30,835
Whass he got on his lapel? One of those trick water squirters?
Gary Sisco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation
Go Back   Jazzcorner's Speakeasy > POLITICS, WORLD ISSUES & WORLD EVENTS

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All material copyright 2009 jazzcorner.com